KTM 1090 Adventure R
KTM 1090 Adventure R
.
The KTM 1090 Adventure R stares down anything in its path. Bespoke WP suspension, offroad wheels and a tough yet fuel-efficient engine are ready to rumble. Decades of rally raid victories roar within.As shrewd as it is chiseled, this bike uses the same state-of-the-art technology as the KTM 1290 ADVENTURE R and even though its engine capacity is smaller, it’s still big on power: 125 hp (92 kW).That’s 23 more than Fabrizio Meoni’s Dakar winning 950. The world is yours - Devour it.
The KTM 1090 Adventure R powered by the same LC81,050 cc V-twin engine which, in normal form, makes 125horsepower (30 more than the current 1050) and 80 pound-feet oftorque. KTM will also be offering a 95 horsepower version, whichcan restricted to 47 horsepower for the A2 licensing system.The 1090 Adventure R share the same steel trellis frame,slipper clutch, traction control, ABS, riding modes, and twinscreen display and both share the same six gallon fuel tank.They each get a Brembo braking system, featuring 320 mm discs, radially mounted four-piston calipers, and Bosch 9M+ ABS
Motorcycle.com Review
2017 KTM 1090 Adventure R vs. KTM 1190 Adventure R
There comes a time in our lives when we find ourselves looking to purchase anew motorcycle, whether new to us or brand-spanking new from the showroom. But,wait, is that model due for an update? Should you wait for the new one or buy anolder model to save some cash?
When KTM rolled out its lineup ofV-Twin Adventure models for 2017, we were surprised the excellent1190 models were dropped in favor of a1290 R and the touring-oriented 1290 T, alongwith the new (to our market) 1090 R,which retails for $14,699. That left the $16,799 1190 R, the winner of ourepic Wire-Wheel Adventure Shootout,out of KTM’s 2017 lineup.To be fair, having a 1090, 1190, and 1290 would havebeen a bit much, so KTM expanded the gap by dropping out the 1190 models. As anowner of an 1190 R, that means that my beloved motorcycle got the boot. Did thatleave me with an obsolete, defunct, and worthless old model? Hardly.
If you were to remove the aftermarket headlight guard on my 1190 R (on right), the only difference from the front would be in color. KTM basically inverted the black and white bits on the front fairings and gas tank cover.
With an 1190 R in my garage and an 1090 R in our fleet, it was natural towonder how the two related models compared. I have been a very happy owner of my2014 KTM Adventure 1190 R for three years and more than 30,000miles. It’s taken me across the country and back, down far-off trails towonderful camping spots, along with all too much commuting. When the othereditors told me I wouldn’t have time to ride my ownmotorcycles, I scoffed. As the idea crept back into my mind days later, Ithought to myself, I am definitely not selling the KTM. I guess if I had tochoose to unload one, it would be the Tuono, even if EiC Dukemay consider disowning me for even contemplating the idea (No, you too shouldhave a non-operational Italian motorbike sitting unused in your garage… –Ed.).What I am saying is that I love the KTM Adventure 1190 R.
Although the 1190 R and 1090 R are very similar in many ways, there are a fewchanges between them that could have prospective buyers choosing one over theother, not the least of which is the $2,100 price difference between a 2016 1190and this new 1090. To make the comparison, Senior Editor John Burns and myselfset out to put these bikes through a little bit of everything, back-to-back, toparse out their biggest differences.
On the freeways of southern California, it was quickly apparent that I wouldunequivocally choose the 1190 with its extra 145cc of power to be my preferredsteed for the battle of the 405 freeway. The extra horsepower helps out whenyou’re cruising at freeway speeds and need a quick hit of power to pass or getout of the way of soccer moms/dads in SUVs.
Actual MO dyno numbers show the two Adventures are closer than we wereoriginally told. The 1090 R cranked out 101 horsepower and 68 lb-ft of torquecompared to 119 horsepower and 74 lb-ft from the 1190 R. While there is anoticeable power difference when riding, it is also clear that the fueling hasbeen revised, as the 1090 R has near perfect fueling. Which is not to say the1190 was bad, it’s just that the 1090 is that much better.
Well, yeah, the bigger engine makes more power everywhere. Keep in mind, though, the 1090’s motor kicks out 23 hp more than Honda’s Africa Twin, so it’s not likely you’ll be wanting more power from your big dirtbike.
As we made our way into the canyons with both bikes in sport mode, it crossed my mind that the 1190 is equipped with Bosch’s cornering ABS, an item that is not available on the lower-market 1090. While that didn’t cause me to want to grab a handful of front brake while leaned, it is nice peace of mind.
John Burns showing the KTM Adventure 1090 R is no slouch through the twisty stuff. At this point the 1190 R had delivered more comfortable high-speed cruising, more power, and the safety net of C-ABS. The fueling on the 1090 however, rivals many bikes on the market for one of the best we have tested. Now it was time to hit some trails to see how the big orange adventure bikes compared, back-to-back, off road. As we hit the trailhead, we stopped both bikes to set the fuel mapping to OFF ROAD mode, which limits engine output to 100 hp (79 hp at the wheel) and changes the torque curve to provide smoother torque lower in the rev-range. We also selected the off-road mode for ABS which allows you to lock the rear while still applying antilock control to the front tire. Now that the bikes were somewhat equal in terms of power, we made our way into the backcountry. For comparison-sake, I would take one bike, then the other, deeper into the trail to dissect their differences. I will note that the 1090 R came outfitted from KTM with Continental TKC 80 tires (including tubes installed), rally footpegs, and an aluminum skid plate, which makes the entire package work a bit better off road. My 1190 R is mostly stock with the exception of Continental TKC 70 tires, a headlight guard, and Touratech top case rack.
After removing the bags for trail riding, it was apparent how much the TKC 80 tires, skidplate, and rally footpegs lent to the 1090 R for use off-road.
The first distinction I noticed was the suspension.This would make sense because, while the 1090 R shares the same travel front andrear, the fork internals and shock are significantly upgraded. The 1090 R’s forkhas a higher spring rate at 6.6 N-mm (up from 5.5 N-mm on the 1190 R) andrevised valving. The shock has also been upgraded from the WP Monoshock found onthe 1190 R to a PDS twin-piston shock to help it from bottoming. This did make aconsiderable difference in keeping the bike compliant in the rocky,chuckhole-ridden terrain we were riding through.
The stiffer spring and new valving on the 1090 R’s WPfork was a welcome upgrade on the trail.
There was only a one-pound difference in the Adventures when we rolled themon our scales: the 1090 R weighed 537 pounds, while my 1190 R weighed 538. KTMclaims the 1090 R is 22 lbs lighter than the 1190 R, but our 1090 tester wasequipped with KTM’s accessory skidplate (12 lbs, according to KTM) andheavy-duty tubes inside thetires.
Even with nearly identical measured weights, the 1090 R does feel lighter andmore flickable when ridden back to back with the 1190 R. The 1190 R’s suspensiondoes feel a bit softer, and in turn, the bike feels a bit heavier. After ridingthe bikes together off-road, it was clear the 1090 has an advantage, but that’snot to say the 1190 isn’t capable.
While both bikes performed well in a variety of environments, the 1090 Rmakes for a slightly betteroff-road motorcycle. If you truly intend to put those TKC 80s to theirrecommended 40% road, 60% off-road ratio, the revised suspension and smootherpower delivery of the KTM Adventure 1090 R will be a willing accomplice and willget the job done at a significant cost saving over the old 1190. If you plan ondoing a bit more grand touring, using mostly pavement but also a few dirt roadsand trails to connect the dots, the extra horsepower and relatively plush rideof the Adventure 1190 R will provide a narrow edge.
It would be easy to opt for the 1190 R if they were the same price, as itenjoys the advantages of added power, a center-stand, cornering ABS, and 12-voltoutlet (which came in handy while using a portable compressor to air thetires back up after we left the trail). But, at $14,699, the 1090 R comes in$2,300 less than the 1190 R’s 2016 MSRP of $16,999 or the $16,799 price of my2014 version. That $2k in your pocket could buy many campground passes and TKC80s.
Give some thought to your true intentions with these bikes and pick the bestAdventure for your uses. You can’t go wrong with either one.
Horsepower (Measured)100.8 hp at 8800 rpm119.7 hp at 9400 rpm
Specifications2017 KTM 1090 Adventure R 2014 KTM 1190 Adventure R MSRP$14,699$16,799 Horsepower (Claimed)125 hp at 8500 rpm150 hp at 8500 rpm Torque (Claimed)80 lb.-ft. at 6500 rpm92 lb.-ft. at 7500 rpm Torque (Measured)68.3 ft-lbs at 8800 rpm74.3 ft-lbs at 7800 rpm Engine Capacity1050cc1195cc Engine Type2-cylinder, 4-stroke, V 75°2-cylinder, 4-stroke, V 75° Bore x Stroke103mm/63mm105mm/69mm Compression13.0:112.5:1 Fuel SystemKeihin EFI (throttle body 52mm)Keihin EFI (throttle body 52mm) Transmission6-speed6-speed ClutchPASC slipper clutch, hydraulically operatedPASC slipper clutch, hydraulically operated Final DriveChainChain FrameChromium-molybdenum trellis frame, powder coatedChromium-molybdenum trellis frame, powder coated Front SuspensionWP-USD 48mm, 220mm of travel (6.6 N-mm springs)WP-USD 48mm, 220mm of travel (5.5 N-mm springs) Rear SuspensionWP PDS twin-piston shock, 220mm of travelWP monoshock, 220mm of travel Front Brakes2 x Brembo 4-piston, radially mounted caliper, brake disc 320mm2 x Brembo 4-piston, radially mounted caliper, brake disc 320mm Rear BrakesBrembo two-piston fixed caliper, brake disc 267mmBrembo two-piston fixed caliper, brake disc 267mm Front Tire90/90-2190/90-21 Rear Tire150/70-18150/70-18 Seat Height35.0 in.35.0 in. Wheelbase62.2 in.62.4 in. Rake/Trail26.0°/123 mm26.0°/119.4 mm Dry Weight (Claimed)472 pounds478 pounds Measured Curb Weight537 pounds538 pounds Fuel Capacity6.1 gal.6.1 gal. ElectronicsRide modes, TC, ABSRide modes, TC, ABSSource Motoecycle.com